The View from Number 80

AB ABSURDO

Number 80 Home Page   80's Recommended Reading

 Links from Number 80


 

Backwards Glances Index 2005 part 3

A word of warning - owing to the Weekly Glance's attempted topicality some of the links below may be even more ephemeral than usual. (Tip - a search for cached versions of missing sites is often productive using either Google or The Internet Archive Way Back Machine.)

 

April 1st 2005  Fox Hunting

April 3rd 2005  Begging Voice

April 5th 2005  Darfur and the Culture of Life

April 7th 2005  The Company You Keep

April 9th 2005  Hari's Game

April 11th 2005  Of Teacups and Intolerance

April 14th 2005  Beetle Honor

April 17th 2005  Beijing Backfire?

April 20th 2005  Faith-Based Electioneering

April 24th 2005  Deya's Day of Reckoning

April 27th 2005  Unhealthy Influences

April 30th 2005   Plagiarize 

May 2nd 2005  Holy Omerta

May 4th 2005  21st Century Delusion

May 5th 2005  Cross Dilemma

May 7th 2005  Vanquished Virgin

May 9th 2005  Bananas in Kansas

May 11th 2005  Ultra Drivel

May 17th 2005  Galloway Bites

May 19th 2005  Shredded Parsley

May 20th 2005  Stephen In Wonderland

May 21st 2005  CLOOB!

May 23rd 2005  PABAAH

May 26th 2005  Journalism? No! Uncritical Plug? Yes!

May 28th 2005  Medium Ghoul

May 30th 2005  Nessie's Gnasher

June 2nd 2005   Smithsonian Institute Blues

June 3rd 2005  Peace One Day

June 4th 2005  Possessed by Superstition

June 7th 2005  African Shame

June 9th 2005  Bible Bashing

June 11th 2005  Legislative Lunacy

June 18th 2005  Not So Fast

June 20th 2005  ID = Intelligent Dutch

June 21st 2005  The Exorcist

June 23rd 2005  PBS

June 24th 2005  No Account Bigots

June 27th 2005  The Wages of Hinn

June 30th 2005  Tiny Tom and the Aliens

 

Fox Hunting - when it comes to impartial, fair and balanced news reporting one name that certainly does not spring to mind is Rupert Murdoch's Fox News. This is not just 80's opinion, but one that is shared by many folk - including Sam Kimery. He has invented the "FOX Blocker" a nifty little gadget that you can fit to your TV to keep it clean of that particular contagion. It appears that Kimery, along with most rational, sentient beings decided that Fox news output was right-wing propaganda, a view also shared by FOX Blocker co-founder Joshua Montgomery. He states "We don't believe in censorship." on the Blocker website and adds "I don't have a problem with FOX News. If they would just come out and say that it is rightwing news for right wing nuts (wingnuts) we will take this site down and move on." An added kicker when you buy a FOX Blocker is that "With every order placed, FOXBlocker.com will send an e-mail in your name to the TOP 10 advertisers at FOX News letting them know that yet another subscriber has opted out of FOX News. With a little luck and a lot of volume, we can shut the FOX up!" Naturally this has upset the fair-minded, impartial and balanced individuals who get their worldview from Fox. Montgomery answers them thus,"All you hate mailers out there (750 or so today) quit sending me "CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NPR and the BBC are left wing liberal hippies......." without EVIDENCE. If you are going to send it, send it with FACTS......Just saying it makes you sound like the stupid, ignorant, uneducated hillbilly you are." Neither Kimery or Montgomery are making any money out of this - they just want to make a point - any profits, should they materialize, will be donated to FAIR.org, MediaMatters.org or Lawrence Freenet. If you have $8.95 burning a hole in your pocket get a FOX Blocker and send a message to Fox.

Miracle Babies - the long-running saga continues. Now the latest twist in the Gilbert Deya Miracle Babies scandal involves Deya's right hand man in the UK, pastor Benjamin Mensah, who stoutly defended Deya when the accusations of baby-smuggling started flying. Now it seems that Mensah has had enough of trying to defend the indefensible and has resigned from Gilbert Deya Ministries. Deya is reported here in the East African Standard as showing little Christian charity toward his former deputy saying "...good riddance as he had been a disgrace to the Church". He went on to say "I'm not interested in fighting wars through litigation. I'm a man of God and there is nothing to worry about." The only real mystery in all of this is why this "man of God" is still in the UK and not deported to Kenya where the police are anxious to talk with him about his activities.

A Glass Cathedral - it is a well-known truism that in a debate or dispute when one party begins comparing the other to Nazis any rational discussion flies out of the window and the discourse deteriorates into abuse. Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor, in attacking women's right to choose in the matter of abortion has unwisely chosen to play the Nazi card. Unwisely because it not only illustrates the poverty of his argument but also because it brings the focus sharply onto the history of his own church. The Roman Catholics at the top of the hierarchy have always been known for their often cosy relationship with fascists - unlike many priests at the lower end of the scale who suffered for their opposition to oppression. Whether it was accommodating Hitler, Mussolini, Franco or more recently, criminals such as Augusto Pinochet the Roman Catholic church with its unelected and authoritarian hierarchy has shown an affinity for repressive fascist governments. Murphy O'Connor, who is already damned in 80's eyes as a paedophile-shifting hypocrite, has managed to sink even lower with his Nazi mudslinging. Those who live in glass cathedrals should be very careful indeed not to start throwing stones. (For more on the Catholic churches links with political authorities this page makes interesting reading.)


April 3rd 2005

Begging Voice - a bigot rattles the collecting box for your money. Not much, just a mere £75,000, in order to allow Christian Voice (CV) to pursue its blasphemy case against the BBC for showing Jerry Springer - the Opera. So goes a begging letter, (in pdf) that can be downloaded from the CV website (and kindly made available in html by Mediawatchwatch. The writer, the sainted Green the Baptist himself, even tries to answer a question that 80 (and many many others) has asked about his protests, which is "Can't God look after Himself?". Green thinks not, although he feels obliged to say "In truth, God could have struck the BBC electrical system with a thunderbolt as we prayed. He chose not to." How does Green know this? Did the old boy tell him personally? Perhaps the big G is saving his thunderbolts for Green himself, to punish him for his arrogant assumption that he speaks for the deity. No, Green has a different answer, but equally silly. "I believe God is generous enough to involve ordinary believing men and women, with all our weaknesses, in His purpose. He wants us to share His victory. He graciously desires fellowship with us." Including such weaknesses as the aforementioned arrogance. On the subject of arrogance, Green has something to say about it himself, in response to his own rhetorical question " Shouldn't we just forgive those responsible for Springer?" He pays lipservice to the idea of forgiveness for, after all, " I dearly want my trespasses forgiven!" (These no doubt would be the trespasses of homophobic bigotry and bullying a cancer charity, to name just a couple.) What he is actually saying is that we should forgive those who trespass against us,  not out of kindness or understanding but for our own benefit, "...not least because only then will God forgive us our trespasses." So, you forgive only in order to be able to get away with (be forgiven for) some trespasses of your own. How very moral. But the twist comes when Green says that we can forgive those who have slighted us, but not those who have slighted others. For "...when that sin is against the Lord Jesus, what arrogance it would be for us to forgive on His behalf!"  And what arrogance it is to condemn on his behalf. Let's be optimistic, this could be a breakthrough - Green at least understands the concept of arrogance - given enough time he may even realize just how much it applies to him and his crude and offensive zealotry. Meanwhile, in the real world, the BBC governors have vindicated the producers of Springer the Opera - although irritatingly this report still repeats the ridiculously inflated numbers for emails received by the BBC in protest. It is technically a fairly trivial exercise to flood an address with duplicated emails - numbers received should not be taken as an indication of the actual number of complainants.

Ark of the Covenant Discovered in Israel - see here for this amazing story which has parallels with the Oded Golan/James Ossuary affair. "An amazing archaeological discovery has been made in Israel, one that could potentially shake the world of antiquities to its core and signal the upcoming bloodbath of Armageddon, according to Biblical experts. Indeed, what appears to be the Ark of the Covenant referred to in the Old Testament has surfaced in, of all places, the private collection of a longtime antiquities dealer." (thanks to the excellent Explorator)

Dumb Quote of the Day - the struggle to keep US schools' science classes unblemished by religion continues unabated. This particular skirmish in Dover, Pennsylvania has been dragging on for a while now as religionists campaign for the teaching of evolution to be replaced by fairy tales. The same tired arguments are trotted out once more about Darwin's Theory being "just a theory". To many of these religionists theory means little more than a guess - they cannot quite get their heads around what theory actually means in science "A well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of phenomena." (WordWeb) Now and again something slips out that illustrates quite how ignorant these fundamentalists are, and epitomises just what this struggle is all about. Pastor and parent Ray Mummert, surely unintentionally, put his finger on the real problem when he said, "Christians are a lot more bold under Bush's leadership, he speaks what a lot of us believe. We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." Which by implication means, in the black and white terms so beloved of the fundamentalists, that Mummert and chums are the stupid, ignorant segment of the culture. Now this is hardly news, but it is nice to have it confirmed by the good pastor. (Much thanks to Gerald Gluch for the heads up. Read Paul Krugman in the New York Times (reg rqd) for a reminder that schools science and the Terri Schiavo case are but two fronts in a much wider, and increasingly dangerous and dirty war.)


April 5th 2005

Darfur and the Culture of Life - the UN security council has voted to refer war crimes suspects involved in the government-enabled murder, rape and torture in Darfur, Sudan to the International Criminal Court (ICC). About bloody time too - at last the US managed to get over its fear of supporting the court in The Hague by abstaining in the vote along with China, Algeria and Brazil. Strange company for the Bush administration and its "culture of life" but at least things may get moving now and this horrible ordeal for the people of Darfur will end. Anne Patterson, US deputy ambassador to the UN is quoted by the BBC as saying "It is important that the international community speak with one voice in order to help promote effective accountability." which is pretty rich considering it was the US that held things up over referral to the ICC in the first place. 80 wonders how many more folk will have been killed because of Bush's prevarication and paranoia. Early last month 80 quoted Captain Brian Steidle on the atrocities in Darfur perpetrated by the Janjaweed militia. Steidle, a former US Marine who was a ceasefire monitor for the African Union tells of his tour of duty in the UK Independent,"In the six months I spent in Darfur as a "ceasefire observer", I saw entire villages burned down with Sudanese locked inside their huts. I saw villagers with their eyes or ears plucked out, or men who had bled to death after being castrated. I interviewed women who had been gang-raped while out collecting firewood." Culture of life? Don't make me sick. Bush and cronies make a loud enough noise over the Terri Schiavo case and other causes dear to right-wing conservative Christian voters, but the lives of the people of Darfur are obviously not so important. You may ask how come 80 singles out  the US and not China, Algeria or Brazil, the other abstainers? Because 80, perhaps foolishly, expected better of the United States. What the hell have they been doing since September last year, when then Secretary of State Colin Powell called what was happening in Darfur genocide? The US administration's hypocrisy sits well next to the outraged squealing of the Sudan government in this report from Islam Online.

Naked Fear - when John Ashcroft let his nipplephobia get the better of him (they keep following me round the room) and had the nude statues in the Great Hall of the Justice Department's headquarters draped at the taxpayers' expense 80 thought he was a uniquely sad little man. This was wrong - he is not unique after all, he has a soulmate in the form of Frank Butler, a zoning inspector for Bartholomew County, Indiana. Butler has ordered that classical-style statues at White River Truck Repair and Yard Art be moved out of the public view. Asked why, this silly little official said, "They have nudity ... and that should not be in the view of a minor." It seems Indiana's obscenity law prohibits the display of nudity where children might see it. You wonder about the moral danger breastfed babies must be in - unless you blindfold them at dinnertime of course. To be honest, it is unfair to have a go at Butler as he is only doing his job - the two creeps that complained to his department in the first place are the real weirdos.


April 7th 2005

The Company You Keep - can say a lot about you. 80 often employs this maxim when looking at, say, a website that makes health claims that appear questionable or unsubstantiated. Just check the other sites that this site links to, and you can get a feeling for where they are coming from. This assessment by association can work in other areas, such as capital punishment. A recent Amnesty International report has found that "During 2004, more than 3,797 people were executed in 25 countries and at least 7,395 were sentenced to death in 64 countries.." Of course this only includes recorded, judicial executions as opposed to widespread, coordinated murders taking place right now in places like Dafur. Also many countries announce a much smaller number than other evidence would lead one to expect, such as global leader in executions, China. According to the Amnesty report "China executed at least 3,400 people, but sources inside the country have estimated the number to be near 10,000." On the other hand it does also strike a hopeful note, saying that there is a "..worldwide trend towards abolition..." but also stresses the "..ongoing need for concerted action by the international community to consign the death penalty to history." This BBC page helpfully publishes a graph of the top six countries in the world judicial murders league - and it is here that the "company you keep" exercise can be employed. In decreasing order of executions are China, Iran, Vietnam, US, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Strange company indeed for a country like the US, with a president who blathers on about a "culture of life"........

On the bottom words are shallow.
On the surface talk is cheap.
You can only judge the distance by the company you keep

Joe Walsh - The Confessor

Gone But Not Forgotten - all over the world the late Pope is being eulogized in such adulatory terms that 80 thought it only fair to mention some of his achievements that have gone strangely unremarked. Damage to the environment caused by the increase in human population, a population in many countries forbidden contraception by this man. Thousands dead and dying from HIV AIDS because they were forbidden to use condoms by this man. Unknown numbers of women dead or seriously injured in backstreet abortion clinics because abortion was forbidden by this man. Thousands of children abused by the Catholic priesthood, a scandal never fully acknowledged by this man. Gays and lesbians worldwide condemned as "... part of a new ideology of evil" by this man. Even now, the old autocrat's  work is still not done, although he himself is dead. He has packed the Conclave of Cardinals with men possessing the same stern conservative views as himself, thereby doing his best to ensure his successor will be in the same mold. (To emphasise business as usual, Cardinal Law, who resigned as Archbishop of Boston in 2002 following accusations that he covered up sexual abuse of children by priests, will be leading a memorial mass for the dead pope. A support group for the victims of priestly abuse will be there, armed with leaflets. This BBC report reminds us "In February 2004, a report commissioned by the Church said more than 4,000 US Roman Catholic priests had faced sexual abuse allegations in the previous 50 years, in cases involving more than 10,000 children - mostly boys.")


April 9th 2005

Hari's Game - 80 has mentioned Johann Hari and his sane and rational articles before. Now, in common with the rest of the world (or so it seems) he has written about the late Karol Wojtyla. He suggests that despite all the excessive adulation for the man he will be seen eventually in the same light as one of his predecessors, Pope Pius XII, as "a deeply malign force". Hari's articles are archived on his website here, and are definitely worth reading. Almost as interesting, however, are the discussions that follow further down the page - although 80 doubts whether some of the contributors are quite what they claim to be. There is one particular correspondent who so fits the profile for a right-wing, religious, homophobic twit that he must surely be a caricature. Anyone that manages to defend the likes of Franco and Pinochet, (they kept those godless commies/socialists in check) and simultaneously maintain an irritating holier-than-thou attitude has to be a fake or a nutter. Here is an example of this person's thinking on the church's condom/AIDS lies, "Condoms are a perversion of sexual intercourse, which is intended for procreation. In discrediting condoms, the Church was not attempting to spread disease, but rather to emphasise that the one truly acceptable course is in fact to abstain from sexual activity altogether, outside of marriage. That message is theologically sound and it is the surest way to prevent disease. The Church is not in the business of advocating condoms as a second-best strategy, because second-best doesn't cut it with God." The thought that this person, assuming they are for real, is out there walking the streets is too worrying to contemplate. There are also those whose postings give 80 the old "I wished I had said that" feeling, a mixture of admiration and jealousy. One of the papal apologists' favorite, and poorly substantiated, claims to absolve Wojtyla in spite of his awful record (see Gone But Not Forgotten) is that he spoke out against communism (mild version) or singlehandedly brought the Berlin wall crashing down (loony version). As Phil, another contributor says, "..even a broken clock tells the correct time twice a day". The last word is Hari's, looking at the catalog of Wojtyla's achievements and the nauseating obsequiousness of his funeral rites and tributes, "If we want to talk about respecting the dead, today we should grieve not for one peddler of superstition, but for the tens of thousands who - thanks to him - did not live to see this day. I do not believe John Paul II will face a Judgement Day in "Heaven". But one day, the fatuous tributes of the past week will rot, and his name will be cursed here on earth."

Funereal Flummery - here is an excellent piece by Polly Toynbee  (in the Guardian) expressing disgust at the world leaders fawning  over a corpse in Rome today. As 80 has attempted below, Toynbee adds a desperately-needed counterbalance to the crawling coverage in the media of Karol Wojtyla and his legacy. As Toynbee so eloquently puts it, " Today's saccharine sanctimony will try to whiten the sepulchre of yet another Pope whose obscurantist faith has caused pointless suffering; it is no defence that he was only obeying higher orders."

TV Ghost Frauds - well worth a look is Tony Youens' Commentary on the stupid TV ghost/psychic shows, in particular the fatuous "Most Haunted Live". In Psychic Dumbing Down Tony asks the question, how may health and safety legislation apply to ghostly "hazards" featured in this show, which is described in the publicity blurb as "...terrifying" and comes away with some interesting observations. The unwelcome spread of such shows has as much to do with the cheapness of production as with the gullibility and ignorance of the target audience. A low light camera system, some "performers" and a bucket load of bullshit and you are there.


April 11th 2005

Of Teacups and Intolerance - sometimes what appears to be a storm in a teacup can presage something far more serious. Take the row going on in the English village of Lyneham in Wiltshire. What seems to have started it was Mitch Hawkin's website www.lynehamvillage.co.uk - or more particularly his references to the late Pope and a spoof ad that he ran for a successor. Hawkin's comments strike 80 as amusing and also to the point - "Fancy a new job? The Vatican is now looking for a new Pope now that the current one has snuffed it. Let's hope the next Pope can do a better job. Better still, why not abolish the position of Pope, as religion, at the end of the day, causes more wars than anything else." Certainly nothing offensive here in 80's view, but that view is not shared by another village resident, one Andy Humm, who coincidentally has his own, rather more conventional and sedate website www.lynehamvillage.com. Not only does Humm think Hawkin's site "shames" Lyneham he told the Guardian "What Mr Hawkin has said about the Pope is disgusting and outrageous. Mr Hawkin should be charged." (Perhaps Humm should have look at Number 80 if he wants to fret about disrespectful coverage of the dead Pope) It seems Humm and a local Tory councillor, Allison Bucknell, are keen for Hawkin to be served an Anti-Social Behaviour Order (ASBO) for daring to mock Wojtyla. The Wiltshire police are said to be investigating. The first observation to make is to wonder whether some of Humm's spluttering outrage is owed to the fact his site visitor numbers have likely dipped - the publicity about the threatened ASBO has no doubt boosted Hawkin's site instead. But aside from the amusement to be had from this, let's face it, petty squabble, there is an important principle at stake. Just because Hawkin has not joined in the nauseating adulatory coverage of the late Wojtyla, but rather expressed, via humor, his opinion of the whole religious circus, should he be gagged? Certainly not. If not given enough scrutiny and opposition Humm and Bucknell might actually succeed in making an ASBO do the job of the (currently shelved) religious hatred law. The idea of these little Englanders dictating what one can or cannot say is in itself "disgusting and outrageous" and should not be permitted to happen. Even if you don't find Hawkin's pages particularly funny, visit his site and show your support. Voltaire's (possibly apocryphal) saying, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" definitely applies here. The use of an ASBO to stifle free speech could well be the thin end of a very nasty wedge. (Thanks to New Humanist for the heads-up on this)

Top Marks for Cain - in the left margin of this page you will find many interesting and useful links, this is the story of one of them. A long time ago, in a galaxy far away, The View from Number 80 started life as a space advocacy page - as you can see it has changed a lot since then, although a vestige of the original purpose still exists further down this page - see Case For Space. Also mentioned on this site since its inception is an internet newsletter called Universe Today, (UT) which is also the source of the syndicated Space News that 80 still runs. Universe Today, now well past its 1000th edition, is the brainchild of Fraser Cain. It has grown over the years from a plain text newsletter to the illustrated, professional product we see today. Apart from running space news and releases, these days UT offers high quality downloadable desktop images and original interviews, book reviews and ads for space-related businesses, an indexed archive from 1999 and a lively forum on a number of space-related topics. Now Cain is running an experiment in Podcasting, (an audio file, usually MP3, that can be downloaded for listening to either on your pc or a portable player when you want). To kick off the service is a short interview with Scott Gaudi at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics about Sedna's lack of a moon. (Sedna is a recently-discovered planetoid three times farther away from Earth than Pluto, and named for an Inuit goddess). To check out the podcast, catch up on space news, discuss space and astronomy, find out how to run Space News on your own site, and enjoy Cain's occasional wry humor, cut along to Universe Today - highly recommended. (Update - UT now has an RSS link to which you can subscribe so that you will automatically hear show updates. For more information visit UT)

Mourners and Shakers - my, what a wonderful place the papal funeral was for bringing people together - there was Prince Charles shaking hands with the dictator of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe and, even more touching, Iranian President Mohammad Khatami and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad shook hands with Israeli President Moshe Katsav. Sadly the warm glow shed on it all by this Reuter's report fails to mention that Charles claims he was "caught by surprise" (pre-nuptial jitters maybe?) and Khatami denies any of it ever happened. Syria does not deny a handshake took place but "this did not change Syria's position on the Jewish state." Officially they are still at war with each other. Sigh..............


April 14th 2005

Beetle Honor - here is an amusing little item - Two former Cornell University entomologists, Quentin Wheeler and Kelly Miller have been busy naming new species of slime mold beetles and have chosen some striking names for three of them. These unfortunate little critters have been named for George W Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld. When asked why, the scientists said it was out of admiration for the principles (?) of the three gentlemen and not because the beetles looked like them. As if anyone would assume otherwise.......

Promises To Keep - here is an op-ed in the New York Times (reg rqd) from Kofi Annan, secretary general of the UN, on the pledges made recently by donor countries to aid those suffering in Sudan and particularly in Darfur. It is one thing to promise aid - it is another thing to keep the promise. As Annan points out "...in 1992, donors pledged $880 million for Cambodian war rehabilitation; three years later, only $460 million had been delivered. Nearly a year after donors promised $1 billion to deal with the devastation caused by the 2003 earthquake in Bam, Iran, less than 20 percent of the money had been delivered." He also reminds us that monetary aid is useless without an end to the atrocities still being committed every day. The sooner the Janjaweed and their government backers stand trial for their actions the better. Meanwhile President Bush's hopelessly inappropriate and insulting nominee for ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, is having a hard time attempting, and failing, to justify his past contemptuous remarks about the institution. Bolton is also tainted by his politicizing of information and fighting to keep blatant inaccuracies in a speech on Cuba's weapons program. This was attempted by intimidating those who felt adherence to the truth was still important, even within the Bush administration. A former intelligence chief, Carl Ford, described Bolton as ""kiss-up, kick-down sort of guy", who tried to bully government analysts into producing the intelligence he wanted." according to the Guardian. Sadly the general feeling is that Bolton will get the job - if so, it will be the equivalent of Bush and his neocons giving the UN the finger - yet again.


April 17th 2005

Beijing Backfire? - nothing in China happens on the public stage without government approval and/or backing. This should be borne in mind when reading news reports of angry Chinese crowds protesting outside Japanese embassies and businesses. The ostensible reason is outrage at Japan's refusal to fully acknowledge the (very genuine) abuses of all kinds perpetrated by them during the invasion and occupation of part of China in the late 1930s, although the real reason is more likely Japan's acknowledgement of Taiwan and also its declaration of oil and gas drilling rights in an area of the China Sea claimed by both powers. If the Chinese government wanted to stop say, the 10,000 people protesting in Shenzhen they could probably do so, after all, just think Tiananmen Square, but at what cost?. Times have changed and the old men who run China had better proceed with caution - having allowed such mass assemblies for their own purposes they may not like the next target of the people's wrath - it could very well be themselves. Turning a communist command economy into a capitalist one capable of trading on the world stage is a ticklish process, and one that could so easily run away from them. As the affluent inhabitants of places like the bubbling capitalist enclave of Shanghai are enviously eyed by the much poorer and less-favored bulk of the huge population, things could turn very nasty indeed. Orchestrating street demonstrations against the Japanese is a weapon that could very easily backfire, with disastrous results for the old Communist hard men.

The God Who Wasn't There - as regular readers know 80 often makes use of Robert Carroll's The Skeptic's Dictionary - there is a permanent link to this excellent site in the left margin of this page. (The dictionary is also available as a regular book and also an ebook). In addition to this, Carroll produces a free newsletter which is always full of information on the strange events and beliefs in the news - plus a healthy shot of humor. The latest issue reached 80 the other day and as ever it is full of good stuff - you can sign up for your copy here. Among the items was a notice of a new movie to be released on DVD, entitled "The God Who Wasn't There". Why straight to DVD? Can you really imagine movie theaters in the US trying to run this, particularly in those states where Imax movies that mention evolution are unwelcome? Due out June 6th, the movie, directed by ex-Christian fundamentalist Brian Flemming looks at the Christ myth theory. Although there is nothing really new here to those that have kept up with modern biblical scholarship, archaeology and history most of the material will come as a complete revelation (to coin a phrase) to those who have never really questioned the story handed out by churches and enshrined in the gospels. Even the view of Jesus as a purely mythic figure has been around for a long time. According to the ad, "The God Who Wasn't There" will feature "...interviews and special commentary tracks with: Richard Dawkins (A Devil's Chaplain), Sam Harris (The End of Faith), Richard Carrier (Sense and Goodness Without God), Alan Dundes (Holy Writ as Oral Lit), Earl Doherty (The Jesus Puzzle), Robert Price (The Incredible Shrinking Son of Man) and many others." Dawkins, Carrier, and Doherty have often been mentioned in 80's pages and their presence bodes well for the movie. Earl Doherty in particular has uncovered a mass of convincing evidence that argues for the ahistoricity of Jesus, and which is available on his outstanding website, The Jesus Puzzle and also in book form. How will religionists react to the movie? Some will ignore it, some will denounce it as satanic and many more will put their figures in their ears and chant "I am not listening, I am not listening...." Throwing over a comfortable belief that tells you that you are somehow special because of your faith cannot be an easy thing to do - let's hope the movie will help a few brave folk make the leap into reality. As the US continues what seems to be an inexorable slide towards theocracy it is truly heartening that Flemming has the guts to to go against the tide.


April 20th 2005

Faith-Based Electioneering - the general election campaign is in full swing in the UK and many secularists are concerned at how far the three main political parties are prepared to go in order to court the religious voters - or what they perceive to be religious voters. One example that worries those who believe that religion does not belong in the classroom is the way the big three all promise the expansion of faith schools, with the Tories in particular promising "perhaps thousands". Their education spokesman, Tim Collins says that Christian, Jewish and Islamic schools have higher standards and a stronger ethos than secular schools. Quite how accurate this claim is and whether it has anything with the ability of these schools to choose only promising pupils is not mentioned. Collins goes on in a quite scandalous and inaccurate fashion, blaming "..decades of departure from faith and family.." for drug misuse and abortions, and "..feral, scavenging youngsters preying on the old and vulnerable." according to this BBC report. This kind of scaremongering nonsense seems to be the way this election campaign is being conducted, at least by the Tories and Labour. That Collins can get away with this drivel is astounding - especially his idiotic assertion that "Faith schools do not divide communities, they brought people together." Try telling that to anyone in Northern Ireland. The very fact that the each of the three religions Collins cites claims that it alone is the true faith is divisive right from the start. This imbecile then goes on to say that faith schools ".... are among the few places where the young can seek out answers to the really big questions - not who will win Pop Idol but what is the purpose of my life and what happens after my death." To attempt an answer to such questions needs not more more schools peddling superstition but an addition to the curriculum of lessons on ethics, philosophy and critical thinking. History shows us that filling student's heads with religious fairy tales is not the way to go - especially if this fool Collins is an example of the sort of person such schools turn out. Despite recent declarations to keep religion out of the election campaign it is right in there - what else is all this faith schools nonsense about but religious electioneering? For UK voters interested in their local candidates' views on matters religious take a look here - if you cannot see your area represented, email your local parliamentary hopefuls, find out their views and submit them to the site. For an earlier piece reflecting 80's disgust at UK political parties toadying to unrepresentative faith groups see Faith Works? It also points out exactly how unpleasant some of these churches are.

Proctology News - a short while back 80 wrote about the unpleasant activities of the nuttier end of the alternative medicine world and in particular a nitwit called Bolen. Here you can read the latest ravings from this thoroughly unpleasant and deluded individual who attempts to portray the actions of those concerned about the dangers of quackery as part of a giant conspiracy (while you are there check the links at the top of the page - can we say nutters? Yes, I think we can.). This latest piece is similar to others in that yet another great victory is claimed over the Quackbuster's conspiracy. With so many victories under his belt you would think Bolen could retire from his labors - unless of course his victories are as delusional as his conspiracies. This clownish, self-described "consumer advocate" and his sad little crusades on behalf of the indefensible would be funny, apart from the fact that he also spreads malicious lies about responsible physicians. If you hear of a new miraculous medical treatment that sounds too good to be true, do yourself a favor, check with these websites Quackwatch, the Quackfiles, HealthWatcher and HealthWatch UK. One last point - why proctology news? Just think where Bolen's head is........... (Update - it has been said that Bolen's advocacy is the kiss of death for any cause he espouses - an observation that is confirmed yet again. 80 may be picky, but having a state medical board rule that the object of Bolen's misplaced affections is a "serious threat" to public health does seem to be a bit of a setback.)


April 24th 2005

Deya's Day of Reckoning - cannot be far off. 80 has been following the story of self-styled archbishop Gilbert Deya and the "miracle babies" scandal since August of last year. Deya boasted that he could miraculously cause sterile, barren and post-menopausal women to have babies through his intercession or as the BBC described his claim at the time, "he can exorcise demons from women who have passed the menopause or who are infertile" . The only snag was that the women, members of Deya's congregation in Britain, would have to travel to Kenya to give birth. It was then that things began to unravel for Deya and his confederates as the Kenyan authorities investigated and accusations of baby-smuggling were voiced. Deya, still in Britain, has maintained his innocence in a most extraordinary fashion, cursing his accusers, apparently believing that his increasingly unhinged outbursts were sufficient to quiet investigations - see here for 80 on the Miracle Babies story as it unfolded. Now the BBC have returned to the subject, having originally featured Deya in a radio show called A "Cure" for Infertility last year and still available online here. Tomorrow, Friday 22nd April at 12:04 pm "...we'll be hearing new evidence on the UK based Gilbert Deya Ministry and its links to child trafficking - currently the focus of police investigations both here and in Kenya." on the You and Yours show. This can be listened to over the web on BBC Radio 4 as it goes out and will be available afterwards on the You and Yours web page. (This is a classic example of how the faithful can be perfect targets for fraud - making use of their undoubted gullibility. Also see Faithful Forfeit and Costly Blind Faith for more examples.)

New Pope Shock - in a startling departure from the ways of the past the Conclave of Cardinals have chosen an old, white, European man to be the next Pope. Who would have thought it?

A Relative, Perhaps? - after hearing the unwelcome news that the pontiff's mastiff, the deeply conservative Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (see Panzerkardinal) is at the front of the running for the job of boss of the Roman Catholic church, 80 was somewhat cheered to read this description of someone who must be relative of his, courtesy of Private Eye magazine. "Joseph Ratpoison, 79, Archbishop of Warfarino. A noted hardline liberal, with profoundly conservative views on issues ranging from abortion to women priests, Ratpoison is a noted linguist, speaking 17 languages, including Croatian, Walloon and Klingon."


April 27th 2005

Unhealthy Influences - unhealthy for free speech and unhealthy for democracy. Catherine Bennett in the Guardian looks at the unprecedented attempts by religious groups to influence the UK general election in a piece rather hopefully entitled "How atheists can swing this spiritual election". In this largely secular country the religionists, perhaps taking comfort from George Bush's re-election, seem determined to stick their oars in wherever and whenever possible. What is more worrying is that the leaders of the three main political parties seem more than happy to court this small and unrepresentative portion of the electorate (see Faith Works? and Faith-based Electioneering). Bizarrely, it would appear that the influence of these church groups with politicians grows in inverse proportion to their shrinking congregations. The media for the most part are happy to play along with this farce as though the fact that these people believe in something they are incapable of proving deserves some kind of respect. (To paraphrase the Beatles' Hey Bulldog, "What makes you think you're something special when you pray?") Why this should be so is a mystery and seems to apply to no other walk of life. Bennett's suggestion is to take a leaf out of the religionist's book and ask parliamentary candidates searching questions to bring out their views on certain contentious matters. Such excellent queries as "How would you defend the state-funding of faith-based education?" and "Where do you stand on therapeutic cloning? If it leads to effective treatments, should a member of Opus Dei ever be allowed to benefit?" should draw out the would-be member of Parliament's beliefs although 80 suspects Bennett takes a certain wicked glee in them, none more so than "Approximately how many people have stopped going to church in the past 15 years? One thousand? Twenty thousand? Or 1m?" and "Are you wearing a spiked garter under your suit?" (To learn more of your local candidate's stance do take a look at this page.)

Microgonesoft? - meanwhile in the country that has set such a bad example of religious politics, the USA, threats by some whining churchman have apparently caused the mighty Microsoft to drop support for a state bill that would have barred discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The New York Times (reg rqd) reports that many feel the software company bowed to pressure from a local evangelical church in Redmond, Washington. Dr. Hutcherson, pastor of the Antioch Bible Church, had meetings with company representatives and claims he threatened them with a national boycott of their products. This does sound rather unlikely as it is damn near impossible to buy an ordinary pc without Windows being installed as the operating system. What would all these holy boycotters do, switch to Linux? Let's face it most people are technically challenged even when faced with something as familiar as Windows, let alone the somewhat arcane breeds of Linux. It is more than likely, in 80's view, that rabid evangelists are even less technically competent than the average - and as 80 has learned from bitter experience, praying has no effect on a balky PC - or anything else for that matter. Swearing, on the other hand, can be wonderfully bloody cathartic.


April 30th 2005

Plagiarize - let no one else's work evade your eyes*. 80 wishes to apologize for lifting material from another publication. When did this happen? Right now - the National Secular Society's Newsline email newsletter is a regular Friday shot in the arm and this week the letter writers have excelled themselves. So, what better than to quote some of their thoughts and incidentally plug the National Secular Society - the NSS have perfected the art of making a point without descending into pomposity - the element of humor is never far away. Anyway, on the with the bare-faced theft... Dave Purnell wrote in with some pertinent observations regarding the new creation museum in Kentucky, "Re. the creationist museum which showed a saddled dinosaur (Newsline last week). This is perfectly sensible. Using established scientific procedure, we start by examining the available evidence (ie. the earth is 10,000 years old), create a testable hypothesis (that man and dinosaurs therefore must have co-existed), then work out the consequences. One of which is that men, as masters of the animal kingdom, would have rode astride the dinosaurs for the purposes of travel, recreation, quarrying, etc. They would also have used smaller herbivores to mow the lawn, and parrot-like dinosaurs as telephones. This is exactly as described in the testimony of the Prophets Hanna and Barbera (peace be upon them), available every day on the Boomerang Channel, Sky 603." Here is Alan Rogers on the pope's funeral, "Later, I accidentally saw a few seconds of the ‘spectacle’ on BBC news. Before I hit the OFF switch I saw Bush, Rice, Blair (responsible for uncounted deaths in Iraq), Prince Charles (adulterer and breaker of wedding vows) and Robert Mugabe (vicious dictator extraordinaire)… all sitting in a line at the pope’s funeral. ‘You know a man by the company he keeps’ even in death it seems." If you find yourself smiling and nodding in agreement with these writers 80 recommends you check out membership of the NSS - for the price of say, a few lottery tickets, you can help make a difference and join a society "...on the side of all humanity, the side of intelligence, rationality and decency".

Soiled Award - like a dog digging up a favorite, mouldering, odiferous bone for one more chew, Ben Goldacre in his current Bad Science column returns to the subject of the You Are What You Eat bullshitter, Gillian McKeith. It seems that in a moment of madness the Soil Association has presented this self-promoting, scientifically-illiterate, minor TV celebrity and pretend nutritionist their 2005 Consumer Education award. Goldacre's take on all this is a breath of fresh air - and one you can inhale here. For an interesting look at McKeith's medical knowledge see this page "In my view Dr Gillian McKeith is a charlatan. For all I know she may genuinely believe what she says and has convinced herself she is giving the truth but there is no scientific basis in anything she says."  So says John Garrow, professor emeritus in human nutrition at London University, retired head of nutrition at St Bartholomew's Hospital and chairman of the internet medical service Healthwatch.


May 2nd 2005

Holy Omerta - Mark Lawson writing in the Guardian on April 23rd revealed a gift for prophecy when he wrote that "The worry for Catholicism, though, is that, for the first time, a pope finds himself subject to the minute journalistic research now standard for political candidates. What if some embarrassing document or revelation about Ratzinger were to be found? " Right on cue the next day in the Guardian's sister paper the Observer was the headline "Pope 'obstructed' sex abuse inquiry". It seems that Pope Benedict XVI, then Joseph Ratzinger, in May 2001 sent a confidential letter to bishops asserting the church's right to make its own investigations of child abuse allegations and to keep those proceedings secret. It orders that the results of investigations be referred to Ratzinger's office which, to quote the Observer, "...has the option of referring them back to private tribunals in which the 'functions of judge, promoter of justice, notary and legal representative can validly be performed for these cases only by priests'." The letter also baldly states "Cases of this kind are subject to the pontifical secret" the disclosure of which could be punished by excommunication. This is less shepherd of the flock and more like capo of the mob - omerta indeed. Ratzinger's attitude is made clear in another Observer piece by the same correspondent, Jamie Doward, about well-corroborated allegations of abuse made against Marcial Maciel, founder of the Legion of Christ and confidant of Pope John Paul II, who described him as "..efficacious guide to youth". Ratzinger is also reported to have said of the accusations "One can't put on trial such a close friend of the Pope as Marcial Maciel". The arrogance displayed here is breathtaking. Sexual abuse of children is apparently not serious to merit investigation if you are a close friend of the Pope. There is no reason to expect that Ratzinger, a man in his late 70's, will undergo a Damascene transformation into someone who actually cares about the abuse of children rather than the Church's reputation just because he now has the top job - it likely to be business as usual - and disgusting business at that. It seems that this old man is quick to see the mote in another's eye but is blind to the bloody great beam in his own. At his inauguration mass Benedict/Ratzinger said that his task was not to pursue his own ideas, but to listen to and be "...guided by the will of God." And who decides what is the will of God? Why, Ratzinger. Dressing a hypocrite in a white stole does not make him any less a hypocrite. In the words of his own scripture, he is nothing but a whited sepulchre "which indeed appears beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones and of all uncleanness". (Matt. 23:27 if you are curious)

Interstellar Bible-Bashers - which is more scary - aliens armed with superweapons or aliens armed with religion? Quite frankly either sounds pretty dire in 80's view, but movie director Steven Speilberg thinks differently. Interstellar bible-bashers hold no fears for him apparently "I can't believe anybody would travel such vast distances bent on destruction. I believe anybody who would travel such vast distances are curious explorers, not conquerors. Carrying weapons a hundred-thousand light-years is quite a schlepp. I believe it's easier to travel 100,000 light-years with their versions of the Bible." Would we be considered ripe for conversion - perhaps the forced conversion suffered by native Americans at the hands of Catholic friars in the New World? Or would we be considered animals or vermin for not being made in their God's image? Considering organized religion's disgusting record on this planet 80 would be happier to see ET's tentacle wrapped around a raygun rather than a bible. Let's hope neither is the case. Perhaps Arthur C Clarke has it right, calling religion a "disease of infancy", and in his novel 3001: The Final Odyssey it has become taboo, a product of man's early ignorance that provoked hatred and bloodshed. Given that so many scientific and technical advances have occurred despite, not because of, organized religion perhaps ET will have outgrown all that nonsense. Perhaps creatures that don't manage this are doomed to extinction. Poor old homo not so sapiens. With rampant Islamic fundamentalism and the Bush administration's efforts to turn the US into a theocracy maybe when ET does land the planet will be vacant, just waiting for some new, and hopefully less destructive and irrational tenants.

Mustache Guy - the truth. Here is an interesting item that goes some way towards explaining George Bush's nomination to the post of UN ambassador of a man whose unsuitability for the job is glaringly obvious, John Bolton. It seems that Bolton was up to his neck in the election scandal in Florida in 2000. The article, from Daily Kos, charmingly, and accurately calls Bolton "Scary Abusive Intelligence-Manipulating Mustache Guy" and highlights his typically bombastic intervention in the vote recount with the words "I'm with the Bush-Cheney team, and I'm here to stop the count." Bolton was called in as attack dog by James Baker, former Secretary of State, when it looked like the Florida count would be crucial to Bush's chances. Bolton's job was to put an end to all that dangerous democracy stuff. As one correspondent says on the Daily Kos page (scroll down to the comments) "Bolton knows where the FL 2000 bodies are buried. If you were Bush/Cheney would you abandon him?" It seems not, hence his current nomination to serve as ambassador to an organization he has repeatedly attacked and belittled. And there was 80 thinking Bush proposed him for the job because of his neat trick of balancing that caterpillar on his upper lip. (According to this article from the Miami Herald Bolton is just one of 50 people who "helped" in the Florida recount battle and who were subsequently rewarded with political appointments)

Quotes - from  comments on the Daily Kos page mentioned above, "The Book of Revelation is NOT a foreign policy manual." and this little gem, "When the rapture comes can I have your stuff?"


May 4th 2005

21st Century Delusion - in an article in the Guardian entitled "The 21st century atheist" Dylan Evans tells us that "Not believing in God is no excuse for being virulently anti-religious or naively pro-science." Evans is senior lecturer in intelligent autonomous systems at the University of the West of England and on his website he proclaims that his book, Introducing Evolutionary Psychology "...was required reading for the main actors in The Matrix". The Matrix, you will recall, was a movie, shot through with religious imagery, about a human race held captive and used as the energy supply for a super computer that kept its human batteries quiescent by fabricating a false reality. In the Guardian piece Evans not only looks to be falling into a delusional trap of his own making, he also takes an ineffectual swipe at what he calls the "...old and tired" atheism of Richard Dawkins and Jonathan Miller. Evans claims to distinguish his 21st century atheism from "old atheism" in three ways, "...it values religion; treats science as simply a means to an end; and finds the meaning of life in art." Leaving the first tenet for the moment let us look at treating science as a means to an end. This is hardly new and would be the position of old atheists as much as new. The idea that old-fashioned atheism can be "..naively pro-science" is a nonsense. Science, or more accurately the scientific method, is a human construct that attempts to understand the universe, how it is put together, how it began and how it may end. It is not perfect, as scientists themselves are fallible humans, but unlike any other human activity it has the virtue of being self-correcting. Science, and its application in technology, has to pass the Feynmann test, "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." If something is shown by experiment not to match Nature then it is rejected, simple as that. All scientific knowledge is open to revision - which happens to be the very opposite of revealed religion. Atheists are questioning types, otherwise they would not be atheists, and their skepticism extends to science, as it does to any human endeavor that claims to offer answers as to how the world truly is. As for Evans's third tenet that his brand of atheism "...finds the meaning of life in art" this is purely an opinion, as any individual's reaction to a work of art is a subjective one.  Asking whether anyone can find the meaning of life in art seems to assume that life has a meaning in the first place. Physicist Steven Weinberg sees things differently, "The more the universe seems comprehensible, the more it also seems pointless." - which again is a  subjective view. If such meaning, or the lack thereof, could be proved objectively there would be no room for religious faith, which is, after all, a blind belief that your particular religion gives meaning to existence.

Which brings us to Evans's first tenet of his new atheism, that it values religion. Here he becomes a victim of his own imagination by falling for his ideal picture of an acceptable version of religion, and yet all the while  ignoring how it actually plays out in the real world. He says, "When I say that I value religion, I don't mean that I see any truth in the stories about gods, devils, souls and saviours. But I do think there is one respect in which religion is more truthful than science - in its depiction of the longing for transcendent meaning that lies in man's heart.....My kind of atheism sees religions as presenting potent metaphors and images to represent human aspirations for transcendence. It is only when these metaphors are understood as such, and not mistaken for literal statements, that the true value of religion is revealed." This is all very fine as a personal point of view, but is not shared by the the growing numbers of politically and socially active religious fundamentalists who believe the old myths and legends in their holy book are literally true - and that this book contains rules everyone else must obey on pain of punishment. The same people would view new or old atheists as incapable of any morality or ethics, which are solely the preserve of the believer and god-given. The sight of the USA under Bush lurching toward an anti-science Christian theocracy, or Islamic suicide bombers sowing death in crowded markets is enough to show Evans's view of religion paints a pretty but grossly innaccurate and naive picture.

The rational world view and the scientific method are under threat as never before and Evans's "21st century atheism" is pathetically inadequate as a tool to combat this. Try discussing religion's "...longing for transcendent meaning..." with a Pope who would like to see medieval Christendom foisted on the European Union, with women in the role of baby-making machines, or a creationist nitwit who believes the planet is a mere few thousand years old and who flatly rejects any scientific evidence to the contrary - and who wants such nonsense taught in schools. Evans reveals how out of touch with reality he is when he says "Atheists who attack religions for painting a false picture of the world are as unsophisticated and immature as religious believers, who mistake the picture for reality. The only mature attitude to religion is to see it for what it is - a kind of art, which only a child could mistake for reality, and which only a child would reject for being false." This sentence shows just how unaware Evans is of the danger posed by religious fundamentalists in positions of power. Try telling a religious fanatic who believes he has been specially chosen by God to blow himself up on a school bus, or to fly an airliner into a skyscraper, or to shoot a doctor who happens to provide abortions, that his religious convictions are "..a kind of art". Evans's so-called 21st century atheism is new in only one thing, its total uselessness in the face of the resurgent, assertive and violent religiosity that threatens everything humanity has learned since the Enlightenment - including the kind of advances that allow Evans to be a senior lecturer in intelligent autonomous systems rather than being persecuted or even killed for his lack of belief. 80 has tried to avoid the "ivory tower" cliche in this short piece but sadly that is from where Evans views his world, a world that does not actually exist. It is little  wonder his book was required reading for the cast of The Matrix. Perhaps it is time Evans took the Red pill.

Here are some other reactions to Evans's piece from Guardian letters, and this is what Butterflies and Wheels has to say about it.

Don't Know How to Vote? - for anyone feeling challenged by the dazzling choices available to UK voters, a look at this page may help you concentrate. Or not.....

Politburo Conclave - here is an interesting article by Andrew Brown comparing the choice of old hardliner Joseph Ratzinger to run the Catholic church with that of the Politburo in the fading days of the Soviet Union when they selected old hardliner Konstantin Chernenko as boss, fighting a rearguard action against change. Hindsight tells us he was the last of the old brigade before Mikhail Gorbachev the reformer. The fact that Gorbachev's reforms actually hastened the end of that corrupt and repressive empire leads Brown to hope that the next occupant of the Vatican will be a Pope Mikhail - with all that implies for the Roman Catholic church. 80 is not convinced, but Brown's take on things is well worth reading, as is much else on the openDemocracy site. For example try George W Bush: far from Mount Rushmore by Godfrey Hodgson, Terri Schiavo, Iraq, social security, stem-cell research, the supreme court – three months into President Bush’s second term, his right-wing coalition is cracking...read on.

Unreal Estate - here is what, at the moment, seems to be a purely American phenomenon - Christian real estate agents. Not real estate agents that just happen to be Christians but agents who trumpet their membership of the faith to promote their business. This piece in the San Francisco Chronicle introduces us to the Christian Real Estate Network and their coyly named website Hismove.com. The main selling pitch seems to be that as these folk believe in a supernatural, undead being, this somehow makes them more trustworthy to do business with. The pledge of performance on the web page had 80 reaching for the sickbag, "As committed believers, and as Real Estate Professionals, we Agree to provide a level of service to our clients which will glorify our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ." How does buying and selling property at a profit glorify their God? It comes down to the usual Christian drivel that because they think a bogeyman is looking over their shoulder all the time ready to damn them for eternity if they screw up they are somehow more ethical. What happened to ordinary, non-supernaturally enforced integrity and fairness? If the only reason someone is square with you is because of their fear of divine retribution, is that not deeply sad? Why not treat others fairly and considerately because you, yourself, not some nebulous savior, feel that is the right thing to do. This whole business is one more example of Christians arrogantly assuming that their particular delusions somehow make them more moral than those who can make up their own minds as to how to treat others. Then, to cap it all, these smug bastards use their supposedly high morals as a marketing tool. Where the hell is that sickbag?


May 5th 2005

Cross Dilemma? - it cannot have escaped the notice of those eligible to vote in UK elections that today is polling day. If you are a humanist/atheist and are still undecided you are leaving things a bit late, but before rushing off to the polling booth take 5 minutes to read this article in New Humanist by Nick Cohen, Where will you put your cross? which looks at what the major parties are offering unbelievers. They are all keen (excepting the Greens) to court the religious vote, but what are they promising those unencumbered by a god or gods? If after reading Cohen you are still a waiverer perhaps you should cast your ballot in favor of the Monster Raving Loony Party which, among other candidates is fielding The Flying Brick, Shadow Minister for The Abolition of Gravity,  Dancing Ken, Shadow Minister of Happiness and Jedediah Caleb Bartimaeus Headbanger,  Shadow Minister of Silly Sausages.

Burka Sprint - sometimes, right in the middle of a serious news item a description or turn of phrase can trigger amusement wholly inappropriate to the subject. This happened today when reading a New York Times piece (reg rqd) about the arrest of a man identified as an al Qaeda bigwig, Abu Faraj al-Libbi. (In passing, 80 can't help thinking the US administration still regards al Qaeda as a hierarchical organization like Ian Fleming's SPECTRE, rather than a loose network that enables disparate and otherwise independent groups of terrorists - but that's another story) The details of his capture  included this description "Two Pakistani intelligence officials said a tip early Monday led to a suspected hideout in Mardan. When intelligence officials arrived, he fled on a motorbike. They pursued him, with two of them disguised as burka-clad women, until Mr. Libbi holed up in a house." 80 cannot help but wonder, just how fast can you move wearing a burka? Two guys wearing tents running after a speeding motorbike must have been quite a sight.....more Inspector Clousseau than James Bond. (Update - despite all the antics it now seems they have no bigwig after all, but a very small fish.)

Backwards Preacher Man - a short while ago 80 mentioned the story of Microsoft and the minister, one Dr. Ken Hutcherson of the Antioch Bible Church in Redmond (see Microgonesoft?). Hutcherson claimed he, or more accurately his threats, caused Microsoft to withdraw support for a state bill that aims to bar discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, a claim 80, at the time, doubted. Apparently Hutcherson feels his faith justifies homophobia, but his actions have attracted scrutiny from many unsympathetic to his prejudices. The Cleveland Plain Dealer does not beat about the bush with an article called "'Lovable' minister preaches hatred" by Connie Schultz. What she is bothered about is not his religiously-inspired prejudice, let's face it, sadly gay-bashing preachers are a dime a dozen, no, she is concerned about the veneer of good humor that shrouds Hutcherson's real motives. As she says, "What I find most troubling about Hutcherson is the charm he brings with every blow to civil liberties. His wit and self-deprecatory humor make for real entertainment, and laughter is a great way to disguise the hate he's peddling." He also uses the fact that he is an African-American (whatever happened to black? Many African-Africans find the term African-American downright silly) to back up his assertion that he understands what it is like to be on the receiving end of prejudice. To 80 this makes it all the more baffling that he in his turn is prejudiced against homosexuality - is he worried that it might be made compulsory? He also is sure that Jesus, who never mentions gays in the Gospels, would "...would have expelled homosexuals." It is an indication of the size of his ego that Hutcherson has the confidence to put words in his deity's mouth. 80 wonders what else Jesus failed to mention that Hutcherson would like to invent. But just how accurate is this bigmouthed preacher's claim that he scared Microsoft with a software boycott into acceding to his demands? This piece from Stranger.com informs us that "Minister and Microsoft Executive Offer Wildly Different Versions of Meeting." Now there's a hard call to make, who's lying, the Beast of Redmond or a religious bigot? Sandeep Kaushik's piece tells us that Microsoft, no doubt somewhat embarrassed and under fire from gay activists, is disputing the minister's claims of influence, although not convincingly. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer denies that Hutcherson influenced the decision to drop support for the legislation and that the decision had already been made. As Kaushik shows, the whole thing has turned into a "yes you did, no I didn't" schoolyard-style spat. The upshot is that no one comes out with any credit whatsoever. Microsoft should not have withdrawn support, whether they were influenced by the preacher or not, they have no justification for their volte-face. Hutcherson has no place trying to push his bigoted views onto others no matter how he sugar-coats his prejudices - he is yet another unpleasant symptom of America's slide into a hypocritical theocracy. Land of the free? Not if you are gay it seems.


May 7th 2005

Vanquished Virgin - the prize for daft headline of the week must go to a BBC news page with "'Vision of the Virgin' vandalised". (To be fair they do get 8 out of ten for alliteration) This vision, like all the other Virgin apparitions, was strictly in the eye of the beholder, as only the eye of faith/gullibility could discern a human figure in what was just a stain on a concrete wall in a Chicago underpass. This leads to the question, can one vandalize a salt stain? The answer has to be no. One Victor Gonzalez has been accused of daubing the wall with the words "big lie" in brown paint which may well be vandalism, but vandalism of a concrete wall and not some imagined image. This "image" of the Virgin is but one of a succession of such. The old girl has turned up as fencepost in Australia (this one was "vandalized" too), and on windows and toast in the US. As 80 has observed before, this minor Christian deity has nothing on the showy tribal god of Old Testament times - at least he could manage a burning bush and a pillar of fire. Personally 80 thinks thinks they are all true manifestions of the blessed Saints Rorschach and Pareidolia.

George Bush will be talking a lot about democracy during his forthcoming trip to Russia, Latvia and Georgia but he couldn't endure the real thing. The British electoral process, flawed though it undoubtedly is, comes far closer to that ideal than Dubya could dare to imagine.This is summed up nicely by a quote from Julian Borger writing in the Guardian on how the election was seen in Washington, DC. "Among so many mixed opinions of the big picture, there were a few things Washington's political class could agree on. Several pundits felt there was something raw and viscerally democratic about the way, the father of a dead soldier could directly confront the prime minister at Sedgefield, and say his piece while the nation studied Mr Blair's face. It could never happen to the president." Damn' right it couldn't.

Talking With Dawkins - if you read only one thing this week (apart from this paragraph obviously) do take a minute or two to read the interview with Richard Dawkins by Gordy Slack at Salon.com. You will need to go through a couple of pages of ads to reach it but it is well worth that minimal inconvenience. 80 was tempted to lift some quotes to give a flavor of the discourse, but the trouble with Dawkins is that almost every sentence qualifies - 80 would have ended merely reprinting the entire interview and no doubt attracting the attention of copyright lawyers. Given this, one representative quote will have to act as an enticement, should one be needed. In answer to the question "How would we be better off without religion?" Dawkins said "We'd all be freed to concentrate on the only life we are ever going to have. We'd be free to exult in the privilege -- the remarkable good fortune -- that each one of us enjoys through having been being born. An astronomically overwhelming majority of the people who could be born never will be. You are one of the tiny minority whose number came up. Be thankful that you have a life, and forsake your vain and presumptuous desire for a second one. The world would be a better place if we all had this positive attitude to life. It would also be a better place if morality was all about doing good to others and refraining from hurting them, rather than religion's morbid obsession with private sin and the evils of sexual enjoyment." There's plenty more where that came from - do read the interview. (Here is another interview from 1995 courtesy of Skeptic.com called Darwin's Dangerous Disciple)


May 9th 2005

Bananas in Kansas - a couple of things needs to be straightened out here - Intelligent Design (ID) is merely the deceitful wing of the creationist movement. The IDer's evasions, when asked exactly who or what their Designer is, are as pathetic as they are unconvincing. Documentary evidence has been around for a good while (see Wedge Cat) that they believe the Designer to be the Judaeo-Christian god and they are dissembling when they say anything else. Given that ID is little more than a front, this reduces the opposition to evolution to one group, the creationists, whether they try to give their nonsense a scientific gloss or not. When I say one group this is not to imply that all creationists agree with each other, but the majority of them in America believe in a young Earth, Noah's flood and all the other biblical myths. What many folk don't realize is that in trying to twist and misinterpret reality to fit their beliefs they not only repudiate evolution but also biology, geology, physics and astronomy. And these are the people putting evolution "on trial" in Kansas right now. In this article in the Washington Post (reg rqd)  the first paragraph encapsulates what is really happening in the dispute about the teaching of evolution in the science class, " Witnesses trying to persuade Kansas officials to encourage more criticism of evolution in public school classrooms are making statements some scientists say betrayed creationist views." More damning is the observation that witnesses in the hearing had not even read the very science standards that they are trying to replace - and neither had "two of three presiding board members". So these people are trying to do away with standards that they haven't even bothered to familiarize themselves with. Now why is this so? Are they just lazy or is the document too difficult for them or do they not need to read it having made up their minds already on religious grounds? Any one of the three, or a combination is likely. Typical of the witnesses is a biology instructor at Kennesaw State University in Georgia, Nancy Bryson who told the Post that life originating from molecules is "..utterly impossible". She then goes on to say "In my personal opinion, I believe there is an intelligent designer." Where is the evidence presented by this woman? All we have is an argument from incredulity backed up by her personal opinion. On this basis how does she qualify as a witness for anything but her own beliefs? One of the two board members who could not be bothered to take the time to read the very proposal she opposes, Kathy Martin, says it all, "I'm not a word-for-word reader in this kind of technical information." Not a word-for-word reader? And this is one of the people who is supposedly competent to decide what children are taught in a science class? Perhaps someone should provide Martin a kindergarten version of the proposal that she can try and get her head around. One also has to wonder on what basis scientific witnesses were selected, such as John Sanford, an associate professor of horticultural sciences at Cornell University who when asked to explain the appearance of humans on the planet answered "My explanation, humbly offered, is that we were specially created." What arrogance - specially created, and since when did humble offerings become scientific evidence?.  It would be interesting to hear his explanation as to why human beings share 50% of their genes with the banana if we are not, however distantly, related. Perhaps his god was working with a limited set of components  - which makes him a rather limited little deity - still, even then, 50% banana doesn't sound much like "..we were specially created". 80 pities the children who will grow up handicapped by the teaching of unscientific nonsense if this bunch have their way. It is enough to drive you half bananas.

The Right Move - further to the piece Backwards Preacher Man it seems that Microsoft has been stung by the adverse criticism and publicity about its retreat in the face of threats from homophobic bigot Dr. Ken Hutcherson of the Antioch Bible Church. The New York Times (reg rqd) tells us that Steve Ballmer, chief exec, sent an email to 35,000 employees in the United States stating, "After looking at the question from all sides, I've concluded that diversity in the workplace is such an important issue for our business that it should be included in our legislative agenda." Hutcherson, whose claims that it was his threats that caused Microsoft to remove  support from a bill against discrimination on sexual orientation grounds have not been substantiated, has yet to comment. As 80 pointed out in an earlier piece (Microgonesoft) Hutcherson's threats of boycotting the company's products never did sound very intimidating. Perhaps Microsoft realized how silly and unworkable a Windows boycott would be - the only wonder is what took them so long. Sadly, in common with many of his fellow religionists this apparent setback to the deeply unpleasant Hutcherson is unlikely to teach him that other people's sexuality is none of his damn' business.


May 11th 2005

Ultra Drivel - not to be outdone by his mom (see Vanquished Virgin) it seems that Jesus has popped up in an ultrasound scan at Toledo Hospital in Ohio. The parents, according to this idiotic ABC news report "...say they received a sign she is special in an ultrasound photo taken about a month ago. After taking a closer look at the ultrasound they say there's an image of Jesus Christ in it. It's an image mom and dad say they can see in two of the ultrasound images taken that day." 80 doesn't wish to say anything to detract from their joy at the birth of a healthy child but it is a sad thought that little Aaliyah's parents will no doubt bring up the child to believe in this drivel. Here is one of the miraculous scans - can you see Jesus' beaming face? No, I thought not.

Conduct Unbecoming..  - "What message are we sending to the world community?....We have sought to appoint an ambassador to the United Nations who himself has been accused of being arrogant, of not listening to his friends, of acting unilaterally, and of bullying those who do not have ability to properly defend themselves. Those are the very characteristics that we are trying to dispel." Senator George V. Voinovich of Ohio, commenting on the nomination of the wholly unsuitable John R. Bolton (see Mustache Guy). Sadly, the same comments could also describe how most of the rest of the world, and many in the US, see George W Bush's America.
 

Finally, The Answer - to one of life's big questions, if not the biggest, and only just a click away.

"Special", Redefined - Prime Ministers of Britain, past and present, have made much of a so-called "special relationship" with the US. Often this seems to be little more than, as in the 1970s and 80s, the island becoming the US's largest aircraft carrier. A recent instance is Tony Blair's eagerness to join with George Bush's neo-con administration in the ill-planned invasion and occupation of Iraq, which, for all spin applied to it, still looks like a bloody quagmire. A less well-known instance of the Blair government's eagerness to please in the aftermath of the 9/11 atrocity is the change to the extradition procedure (Extradition Act 2003) to the US. This removed the requirement for American prosecutors to present a prima facie ("at first sight") case before a British extradition hearing. Simply put, they need present no evidence. This change, by removing such a check, has greatly speeded up the procedure - but to whose benefit? In February this year, according to this Guardian piece by Simon Bowers, Blair defended the Act as justified and right in a "post September 11" context. So, how many requests have been made under the act? 43, "...of which 22 relate to white-collar crime charges. Only three relate to terrorism suspects." Still, with this special relationship it must make it easier for the Brits to get hold of any miscreants hiding out in the US, right? Wrong - the Bush government has yet to sign a reciprocal agreement. Which means this is a one-way street - a case of you scratch my back and you can scratch your own too. Now you know what is so special about the so-called special relationship - nothing. 80 will be watching the challenge being mounted to this ridiculous state of affairs by the lawyers of the latest white collar suspect that Uncle Sam wants handed over. (see Joshua Rozenberg in the Telegraph for details.) This is yet another instance of a nasty phenomenon that obtains on both sides of the Atlantic - the loss of civil liberties in the name of the "war against terror" that in fact has nothing to do with terrorism - unless you happen to be a Prime Minister trying to justify this nonsense.


May 17th 2005

Galloway Bites - 80 has never been much of a fan of British MP George Galloway but you have to admire the slapping he gave the US Senate Oil for Food investigator, Senator Norman Coleman. Obviously no one had checked out what a handful Galloway can be, which is why he was handed such a platform to criticize the invasion of Iraq and its continuing bloody consequences.  The whole confrontation was a circus, but it certainly wasn't stroppy George who ended up looking like a clown. This account from The Nation by John Nichols is hardly unbiased reporting but is certainly entertaining enough in its own way. Perhaps Mr Galloway should visit the US more often. (For more on the Oil for Food scam this piece from Capitol Hill Blue and this in the Guardian make for interesting reading. Two words that spring to mind are, cui bono?)
 

What's In a Name? - in Contra Costa county, Northern California, one of the area's beautiful landmarks, Mount Diablo, is under attack. Not the landmark itself, you understand, but its name. This is a favorite spot of 80's for a walk, a picnic and just to take in the scenery, but it seems the name given it by the original Spanish settlers is not good enough for one particular gentleman, Art Mijares. He wants it changed and has applied to the U.S. Board of Geographic Names to do so, according to this SF Gate.com piece. The name he suggests is Mount Kawukum, which he claims is indigenous and means "laughing mountain, everywhere seen." If the reason for the change was driven by the same kind of considerations as the Australian Ayers Rock, named after its European "discoverer" and now called by its original (and aboriginal) name, Uluru, one could have some sympathy with Mijares but this is not the case. He wants it changed because he thinks it is named after an imaginary bogeyman, otherwise known as Mr Scratch, Old Nick or the Devil. So what if it is? This is yet another tiresome example of a whiny Christian wanting to change or censor something because of his superstitious fear. If it's not Hallowe'en or Harry Potter it's Mount Diablo. A recent local example quoted in the SFGate article is the change of name from Diablo Street to Antioch Street in nearby Vallejo, after the Antioch Church of God had complained. Now this church probably thinks Antioch is a nice Christian name and that city, now in Southern Turkey, was indeed an early center of Christian activity. What they probably don't know is that it was originally founded by the pagan Seleucid dynasty, descendants of one of Alexander the Great's generals, Seleucus. A later Seleucid king, Antiochus Epiphanes, was notorious for occupying Jerusalem and desecrating the temple there, a temple in which, rebuilt by Herod the Great, the  bible says Jesus and his disciples worshipped. (There is also the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch, but that's another story.) Happily the SFGate piece takes Mijares' concerns lightly - it seems even his suggested name, Kawukum, does not exist in the Californian Indian languages. It appears that Mijares does not know what the devil he is talking about. It is a beautiful mountain by any name and if Mount Diablo has been good enough since the early 19th century there is no point in changing it now to pander to the superstitions of the ignorant. For explanations of many names in Mount Diablo State Park, including the mountain, take a look here. For those of you who don't want this pointless name change to happen go to SaveMountDiablo.org and join the campaign to stop this nonsense in its tracks. Oh, by the way, if you are up there anytime enjoying Mount D's natural beauty and you catch a glimpse of a guy with horns and a tail - that'll be 80 out for a stroll. (By a strange coincidence Contra Costa features in the current View - see here)


May 19th 2005

Shredded Parsley - 80 has mentioned the Humanist Network News on several occasions. It is a free weekly compendium of news items and comment from a (surprise, surprise) humanist perspective. Based in the US it regularly features news from all around the world, with input from particularly Canada and the UK. It is one of the public faces of an educational non-profit organization, The Institute for Humanist Studies (IHS), which is a think tank whose mission is to promote greater public awareness, understanding, and support for humanism. The Institute specializes in pioneering new technology and methods for the advancement of humanism. You can sign up to receive a copy on their website or simply click the link in the left margin of this page. One regular feature is a book review section, and for the last five weeks Kenneth W Krause has been looking at Pastor Rod Parsley's Silent No More: Bringing Clarity to America... While Freedom Still Rings. Over this time Krause has skilfully dissected and examined the worldview  of Parsley, as enshrined in his book, and finds it seriously wanting. Parsley, founder of the Center for Moral Clarity, is one of a growing number of religionists in the US and elsewhere who feel constricted by the separation of Church and State and would like to see their religious beliefs given the force of law. Right from the start Krause shows us the mind behind the book, "[T]his book isn't designed to move you to think great thoughts," confesses Rod Parsley.......in the introduction to his new book, Silent No More. One could at least credit the pastor with candor and consistency, I suppose, had he not recorded the sentence, "I don't apologize for writing a book that requires thought," only one short paragraph earlier. Confused? So was I, until I grudgingly accepted that both con and contradiction are core elements of Parsley's style." To read this whole fascinating and highly recommended review click here. A look at Parsley's book on Amazon.com is also informative, especially about the company it keeps. This is represented by the list of other books purchased by buyers of Silent No More, which include "The Maker's Diet: The 40 Day Health Experience That Will Change Your Life Forever" and "The American Prophecies: Ancient Scriptures Reveal Our Nation's Future". Several readers' reviews are full of gushing praise for the book. Here's one that seems to encapsulate Parsley's target audience "Courageous and Truthful ....The book just confrms what others before him have been saying and proclaiming: Islam is a threat to human civilization....Christianity is being viciously attacked by liberal politicians in Washington and other anti-Christian groups, now a humble preacher decided to be "silent not (sic) more."" 80 wonders which liberal politicians these might be - certainly not the ones in the majority right now. As a counterbalance to this there is a review that is a model of brevity and which 80 feels hits this particular nail on the head, "Utter Bovine Scat - Another example of a fundy who thinks that unless he has the power to force all of us to conform to his thinking that he is being discriminated against. Full of lies and half truths." This last quote is  Krause's summation from his review, "The pastor quite correctly observed that “people are grasping for spirituality at any price.” But I hope “any price” will not include the purchase of this book, because I would feel especially sorry for any person who bought it expecting to learn something."

Empathy Lesson - here is a suggestion for Pastor Parsley (see above) and others like him that yearn for a theocracy. Try and use your limited intellect to imagine how ghastly and dreadful you would find life under the Taleban or the mullahs of Iran. Got that picture in your head? Good, now try and understand that is exactly how 80 and many, many others feel about your projected Christian state.


May 20th 2005

Stephen in Wonderland - it can be very sad to watch an individual's retreat from reality but in the case of Stephen Green, of loony pressure group Christian Voice, it can afford a great deal of amusement. In Britain it is traditional that an incoming government's proposed program of legislation is announced in the Queen's Speech, whereby the monarch is obliged to parrot whatever has been written for her by the politicians. The real thing is pantomime enough, but it is obviously far too close to the real world for Green, who has produced his own weirdo Christian fundamentalist version for the monarch to mouth - a Green's Speech if you will. Upon reading this document the first observation is that the spelling and grammar are pretty good, which leads to the conclusion that Green must have had a grown-up to help him. (Although as the speech is downloadable in Word format perhaps it was the blessed St. Clippy who did the work.) Secondly, as has been noted elsewhere, he indulges in the usual cherrypicking of biblical laws, a common practice with religious nuts. There is little need to discuss his ravings point by point as we have heard it all before, ad nauseam. The main impression 80 gets from this document is that Green is retreating into a never-never land. He is clearly losing his struggle with reality and this imaginary Queen's speech is only more evidence of that. His fantasy talebanisation of  Britain would be repugnant to everyone, bar a few of his fellow loonies. He seems to have slipped up though, for search as 80 may, there is no clause proclaiming Green as Archbishop-General of Great Britain. No doubt he will rectify this omission in the near future. Purely in the spirit of humanist charity 80 would like to extend to Green the same advice offered to the equally offensive Pastor Parsley - see Empathy Lesson below.
 

Star Wars v Adolf Hitler - if you were concerned about the level of debate in the US Senate over the filibuster row, a look at this page (reg rqd) from the New York Times will not set your mind at rest one tiny bit. As the preparation continues for the forthcoming battle over George Bush's judicial nominees, new standards were set when Senator Frank R. Lautenberg, Democrat of New Jersey, brought out a picture of Chancellor Palpatine, a character in the new "Star Wars" movie, and noted that he was a Senate leader who broke rules to amass power."As millions of Americans go to see this film in the weeks ahead, I sincerely hope that it doesn't mirror actions being contemplated in the Senate of the United States." Mr. Lautenberg said. There was only one thing left for Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania to do, and that was to play the Nazi card. In blaming the Democrats for breaking with Senate tradition by their tactics he said, "It's the equivalent of Adolf Hitler in 1942 saying: 'I'm in Paris. How dare you invade me. How dare you bomb my city? It's mine.' " Later, regretting his remark Santorum said "....it was a mistake and I meant no offense." Somehow 80 doesn't think exchanges like these add anything to the debate and succeed in making the whole process sound like brats squabbling in a school yard.


May 21st 2005

CLOOB! - after reading the astrologers' mealy-mouthed spinning of their less than spot on predictions for the UK general election, which shows them no better informed than anyone else and a damn' sight sillier, 80 was reminded of a word recently coined by Tony Youens - cloob. Tony defines it as "..actually shorthand for “complete load of old bollocks” and although it can be applied to anything supernatural it is by no means limited to that field. For example homeopathy is also a cloob." Although abuse is considered a fairly low tactic in a debate the word cloob is more than justified when describing the same tired old nonsensical claims that, even though they have no supporting evidence whatsoever, are endlessly recycled by the gullible, the stupid and the just plain crooked. It also nicely describes New Age silliness, such as the movie "What the Bleep Do We Know?" Tony has also added a new page to his