Photo Phakes - when the science and art of photography were young the various spurious artifacts that can produced by the process were not fully understood. Errors in developing, double exposures and lens flares were often taken to be real things, invisible to the photographer at the time but miraculously revealed in the darkroom. This resulted in claims of spirit or ghost photographs which were eagerly held up by believers in the supernatural, such as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, as evidence for an afterlife. Today we should know better, particularly with the advent of digital photography with its own retinue of artifacts and ease of manipulation. But of course we don't, and eagerly embrace old and new photos of the supernatural with as much gullibility as any Victorian. The web is the perfect place for folk to showcase their images and there are sites devoted this silliness in great abundance.
Best of the Worst? - About.com's Paranormal site has a section featuring what are claimed to be "The Best Ghost Photos Ever Taken". The page is prefaced by a paragraph or two saying much the same thing as 80 does here about double exposure, digital manipulation etc. but this is followed by a typical believer's declaration. "But these photos are generally thought to be untouched, genuine portraits of the unexplained." Ah yes, there is always a but, although no evidence is given why these images and not others are particularly convincing. The photos displayed are all from the late 19th and early 20th century and are much the same kind of thing that appeals to addled types such as the The International Survivalist Society. (see Holey Cell Survivalist). Blurry, indistinct double exposures are all that can be offered as the "Best", and will only confirm not the reality of an afterlife, but near infinite human capacity for credulity. One such photo is of "The Brown Lady", a misty, wraith-like figure ascending or descending a staircase, puzzlingly described as "arguably the most famous and well-regarded ghost photograph ever taken.". A completely unsubstantiated claim that this blur is the ghost of a former resident, who had been ill-treated by her cad of a husband, leads to a description of the actual taking of the picture in 1936. "All at once I detected an ethereal veiled form coming slowly down the stairs. Rather excitedly, I called out sharply: 'Quick, quick, there's something.' I pressed the trigger of the flashlight pistol." This is slightly unusual in that it is claimed the ghost was seen prior to the shutter release, although we only have the word of a single witness. The other person present saw nothing, for he had his head under a cloth attached to his camera. The picture is unconvincing and the eye witness account useless, uncorroborated as it is. Remember this is supposed to be an example of the "best" spirit phography has to offer! It is noted that the cad in the accompanying story was an "ancestor of Thomas Townsend Brown, an American physicist who experimented with anti-gravity and flying saucers in the 1930s, and whose name has been connected to The Philadelphia Experiment." But that is another whole can of paranormal worms.
...and the Winner Is - the other three photos displayed are no better and each is accompanied by a supporting ghostly anecdote, as though this gave the image some verisimilitude. There is even a poll asking which is the best of the four. The winner is the "Brown Lady", a singularly odd title for a black and white picture of a blur, and properly refers to the ghost story and not the image. The connection between the the two is never established. The subject of spirit photos formed the very first item in The Glance, 80's look at current news and events, in June 2002. This featured a fascinating (and unintentionally funny) collection from the American Museum of Photography, which happily is still available under the title Spirit Photography 1868 - 1935 covering the heyday of the seance and pictures of spirits, apports and ectoplasm. This last is a nasty exudate produced by mediums in those days, but now rarely seen. The old photos that feature this substance reveal it to look most often like fine muslin cloth, and less frequently but more repulsively, snot. Also still on display are the highly entertaining, surreal and openly faked photos by William H. "Dad" Martin, which are wonderful, and have not dated in the same way as their spirit brethren. Just take a look at this untitled picture from a county fair to appreciate Martin's skill - this was no point and click digital manipulation - and his great sense of the absurd.